Imo State and The Cost Of Ineptitude

0
77

By Bamikole Oluwafemi Adeleye

On the 6th of May 2011, after a tightly contested supplementary election, Mr Okorocha emerged winner of Imo State gubernatorial election, prompting huge celebrations and  marches in the state. Well wishers, the poor, the rich, the young and old trooped out to  celebrate their hard-earned victory.

To Imo citizens, the last leader with foresight and vision was the late Sam Mbakwe. The  revolt against Ohakim’s leadership was a scathing rebuke to the trend of leadership in  Imo state, one with twists and turns: imprisonment, harassment, and even many alleged  untimely deaths. In 2011, the despicable and despotic civilian rule under ousted  Governor Ohakim had led to a public electoral revolt.

Highly motivated, the electorate rejected Ohakim and turned to Okorocha, whose era,  they believed, would lead to the true rebirth of the virtues and fortunes of Imo state. Imo’s electorate had despised rain and sunshine to cast their vote and elect Rochas  Okorocha: a proclaimed self-styled populist, “education philanthropist” and now  saviour of the people.

National growth LS

With Okorocha’s victory, Imo citizens looked forward to a series of mind-blowing  impressive development accomplishment and for change premised on good governance practices. Unknown to the public however, after years of anticipation and strategic  branding, the victory for Mr Okorocha was the first stepping stone towards the  leadership of the Progressives Governors Forum and his ultimate ambition: Nigeria’s  presidency.

Imo has not been fortunate. The cannibalistic carnage that beset Imo state has not  dwindled since the late Sam Mbakwe. Ineptitude, massive corruption, lack of thought  and purposefulness, amongst others were consistent in the state’s chequered political  leadership and history; and the impact of this blind leadership was evident in the state.

Development indices in Imo state grind to a stop, as successive leaders, one after  another, ran the state as a personal fiefdom: with phantom elephant projects (with no  value and impact on the local economy). Their leadership went unchallenged,  uncontrolled, as they became more rapacious in expropriating state wealth. More was  the audacity and uninhibited glee in the display of wealth; and above all, brazen  recklessness in the display of maddening ineptitude.

Imo state under Mr. Rochas Okorocha was envisioned to be different. Intent on securing  a second term, he kicked off with fanfare. Flurry of new road openings, even if poorly  done or uncompleted, began. Having promised an array of benefits including attracting  FDI, huge industries and provision of jobs; Imo citizens finally believed the potentials of  the state and its enterprising citizenry will become a reality under Mr Okorocha. Party faithful believed his achievements will cement APC’s outlook as a once rejected but-now-dynamic party working for the people in South Eastern Nigeria. Citizens  believed that quick and good policy reforms and his larger than life image will help attract businesses  to Imo.

Okorocha’s victory from the onset was not an open handed welcome of APC but rather  a rejection of the incumbent Ohakim. He had run under the “change” mantra of the  APC, touting his highly questionable private sector and philanthropist record, and  riding on more of the disapproving dislike for incumbent than on his own record.

This sentiment reverberated not only in the state, but at the centre, where an unpopular  and irredeemably corrupt President faced a popular APC candidate and an emboldened  opposition party who rode on the continuously repeated failures of the presidency and  the ruling PDP party.

Unfortunately, this viral expectation, climaxing in the pageantry and pomp that  heralded Mr Okorocha’s victory has been met with characteristic failure of leadership, a  lack of clarity, sincerity of purpose and the persistent ineptitude that has bedeviled Imo  state.
Six years down that memorable day, Imo state under Mr Okorocha has been worse off.

All human indices for development have plummeted: education, health, security, social  welfare and freedom of speech. Basic infrastructure that serves or aid healthy living and  businesses have grinded to a halt: roads are unpaved and many started by Mr Okorocha  have been retouched more than four (4) times.

These existing and new roads, spread across the New Owerri axis, the 4th Inward roads,  Medical road, Old Owerri road, MCC Road, Iba Adan, Maranatha avenue, Okigwe road. Abah branch to Okpala, amongst numerous others. Many across Okigwe, Mbaise, Orlu, and other import local governments and communities are in disrepair. Of all roads  visited, only Akachia road seem to be in good shape.

Massive projects from previous administrations are abandoned: bridges started by  Ohakim and the government house by Udenwa have been abandoned, the Okigwe  roundabout (with no significant purpose) is being badly constructed, constituting an immense obstruction of traffic and a serious challenge to business. The Okigwe dual lane (enroute Abia) itself is in total disrepair.

Interviewed pregnant women complain about the high rates of basic (ante-natal care) health diagnosis, prompting all of them to resort to the private sector healthcare  providers. Out-of-pocket health spending in Imo state is astronomical. Of the entire  initiated “world class” hospitals across Imo, only one has been completed three years  after (the Airforce Hospital). Needless to say that basic equipment across the general  hospitals have crumbled with aging equipment, contributing to an already low standard  of living.

Worse, the ease-of-doing business and microeconomic assays under Imo have  been a shambles. Capital access for small businesses is unavailable, and many small scale  agricultural businesses have folded. Older industrial areas have become skeleton town;  in fact, the only oil palm industry owned by the state now bears Roche Plantation. It is unknown if this Mr Okorocha’s new pet peeve.

Under Mr Okorocha, Imo state’s industries have suffered greatly. His promises of jobs  and industries have left no one in doubt of his mastery at deception. The “Youth Must Work” program has failed miserably, ease of doing business ratings is one of the worst of APC-led states, comparable only to Plateau state, Kogi state, and other business unfriendly environments.

To Imo citizens, APC has successfully hoisted on Nigerians a series of calculated but well-spoken fraud-men and scammers. To think the ineffective Okorocha is the poster  child of APC in the South East speaks volumes of the ineffective “change” mantra championed from the presidency itself, an indictment of the lack of ideology and  purpose-driven leadership which APC campaigned for and marshalled with its media  sophistry.
Mr Okorocha’s high handedness has left many communities and local governments scrambling to cope with basic survival, with many families unpaid, and having to  grapple with daily basic needs. Since his outlandish refusal to pay wages and pension  fiasco in the predominantly civil-service driven state (like many Nigerian states), many  households have lost their revenues and the standard of life and living has deteriorated  considerably.

Mr Okorocha’s moves are short-term measures intended to pacify the amnesiac public  and provide temporary ecstatic succour to the public. His penchant for a flurry of  construction work without real and true economic impact speaks volumes across the  state.
The poor quality of work, and thought in the process of policy programs and in leadership has contributed massively to the decline in public trust and in the APC. More  tragically, six years after his victory, a lot of these unprofitable non-impacting projects  projects have depleted taxpayers fund that could otherwise be used in more  economically viable programs.

The “rescue mission” in Imo state is replete with roads without economic impact on  businesses and farmers; massive conference centres that add little or immediate impact  to the state’s economy; skills centres without plans towards supporting economic  clusters; and weak educational programs that offer nothing but an outdated curriculum.

Respondents accuse Mr Okorocha of being corrupt; questioning the monstrous personal estate he started a few years after being governor. Importantly, they worry about the  source of funding used for the project. The subject of Mr Okorocha’s wealth is a discourse for another day. Till date, no one knows what the source of his wealth is!

Rochas Okorocha’s massive estate is the first of any sitting governor in Nigeria,  estimated to cover at least 8 hectares of land. As a sitting governor, one is compelled to  ask how Mr Okorocha got the land, or the money to construct such gigantic project  within Owerri.

Moreover, hearsays have it that Mr Okorocha was “forced” to change the name of the  estate to the “Rochas Okorocha Foundation for Africa” after the visit of President Buhari, who in his candor, frowned (marvelled) at sighting the construction of the  empire and pondered on the source of the funding of the project.

His peculiar way of handling projects has opened the floodgates of impunity in  implementation, ranging from poor quality to destruction of houses. Many struggling  businesses have closed because of the toxic business environment, while the Owerri  Council Development Agency has become the state tool in destroying shops and kiosks  that hamper road construction.

Rochas’ methodology in handling “state development” projects creates a repeated  Nigerian narrative of conflicting interests and unethical practices by public leaders. House of Freeda is allegedly owned by Rochas’ daughter. One is compelled to ask “with which resources was it built?” He is quick to sway the public with his benign smile and  rhetoric, but deep down, Imo state is nothing but an avenue for half-brained half cooked  policy programs, backed with personal agendas.

His sycophants and media apparatchiks are in full force, singing his empty praise at  every twist and turn. Truly, the “rescue mission” and “Imo will be great again” has been  nothing more than crafty media propaganda to shore up his image as a performer,  advocate of good reforms and reinforce his image (shockingly) as a viable next presidential candidate. Ironically, in reality, Mr Okorocha’s rescue mission has been nothing but a personal and family rescue mission!

Bamikole Oluwafemi Adeleye

Follow Us On WhatsApp