Former chief executives, union and group of retirees from the Nigeria Telecommunications Limited (NITEL) on Wednesday rose stoutly against what they described as an attempt by former FCT Minister Nasir El-Rufa’i to push away the blame for the destruction of the telecommunications monopoly from himself, urging the Nigerian government to hold the former Director-General of the Bureau of Public Enterprises (BPE) solely responsible for this monumental national loss.
One of the former Managing Directors of MTEL, the GSM arm of NITEL, Engr. Kunle Bello who voluntarily resigned so he could avoid the touted new managers, Pentascope said he foresaw the collapse of NITEL/MTEL due to insincere and inconsistent implementation of policies by the El-Rufai- led BPE.
He described the Pentascope management brought in by El-Rufai as an “irredeemable misfortune” upon the telecommunications industry and an unmitigated disaster on NITEL/MTEL staff “who have been dying one after another” due to non-payment of pensions.
Engineer Bello, an ITU telecommunications expert said Pentascope squandered more than N100 billion of NITEL’s hard-earned money, besides the loss of revenue without adding a single telephone line.
He challenged the nation’s judicial and executive arms of government to rise to the occasion to acquaint themselves of blame by going after the perpetrators of the fraud.
In a statement the group of retirees signed and issued in Abuja on Wednesday, they disagreed with the claim in a widely-circulated statement by El-Rufai that former Vice President Atiku Abubakar approved the appointment of Pentascope, the failed management consultant hired to manage NITEL in 2003.
The former workers who said they held El-Rufai responsible not only for the collapse of NITEL, but also the destruction of their careers, said, the issue at stake is beyond the debate of who signed and who did not sign. “The issue is who issued or originated the memorandum to the National Council on Privatization (NCP)? How did El-Rufai, as DG BPE pick Pentascope to manage NITEL?”
The retirees accused El-Rufai of misleading, not only the National Council on Privatization, but the entire Government of the Federation by presenting Pentascope as a capable management company that could turn around NITEL.
One of such ex-staff, who spoke with reporters on this issue, Michael Awos who put in 30 years as a technical staff beginning with the defunct P & T said that Pentascope was brought purposely to “siphon money and kill this organization (NITEL) they had spent all their lives to build.”
“He broke and twisted all the rules to make Pentascope win. Penstascope was one and the same with El-Rufai. The face of Pentascope was represented by El-Rufai’s two closest friends Mr. Hassan Musa Usman and Tijjani Abdullahi. Pentascope in Holland was a one-man office. It had a single room at its office. It’s Rolling Mast was on top of a Church building.
“El-Rufai orchestrated the fall of NITEL because he was bitter he failed to win the bid to build its new Abuja headquarters. He destroyed NITEL because of this and shattered our careers in the process,” the retirees lamented.
The retirees went on to say that the true story of the destruction of their National Carrier has been revealed in two reports by the House of Representatives and the Senate.
Quoting from the report, the retirees said that “rather than using Atiku as scapegoat for the collapse of NITEL to serve his hidden agenda, the concerned group of former NITEL workers advised El-Rufai to be honourable enough to accept the responsibility for railroading and blackmailing the former NITEL board and the privatization council into approving a contract that had short-changed Nigerians and children yet unborn.
According to these former NITEL workers, who described themselves as the “human debris of the destruction wrought on NITEL by El-Rufai’s selfish and callous agenda to short-change Nigerians,” the former BPE DG should apologize to Nigerians for his misdeeds.
They recalled that in May 2003, the House of Representatives exposed the underbelly of El-Rufai’s hypocrisy and brazen lies to mislead the federal government and Nigerians about the Pentascope management contract.
The Committee they said, found that the evaluation of the bids was “suspect” and that Pentascope lied on its true legal status and origin, which the group said El-Rufa’i cleverly covered up.
Reacting resentfully at El-Rufai’s statement, the former NITEL workers said the House of Representatives found that Pentascope was supposedly registered on January 1, 2002, which was a public holiday in European countries.
Despite the inaccuracies and lies by Pentascope, the group accused El-Rufa’i of imposing the Dutch company on a hostile NITEL board, its workers and Nigerians.
Despite the dramatic drop in turnover under Pentascope management, the group alleged that direct costs and overhead costs increased from N21.3 billion to N26.3 billion and from N19.4 billion to N30 billion.
The NITEL former staff, therefore, advised El-Rufa’i to focus on these issues rather than using others as a scapegoat, saying that it is not uncommon for leaders to be misled by clever liars into signing something that turned out to be fraudulently arranged to produce a desired outcome.
The retired NITEL workers wonder why El-Rufa’i thinks the House of Representatives, the former NITEL board and others that exposed the fraudulent process of handing over NITEL to Pentascope were wrong and he was right.
Comrade Elias Kazzah, National Adviser of Senior Staff Association of Communications, Transport and Corporations (SSACTC) and President of the NITEL unit of the association, who spoke in the same vein, called on El-Rufai to shut up on account of his mismanagement of the Pentascope transaction that led to the demise of the company.
Comrade Kazzah who spoke on behalf of the NITEL union said El-Rufai’s dubious imposition of Pentascope on NITEL and Nigeria led to huge economic losses to the economy considering the huge remittances of the national carrier to the nation’s economy, destroyed careers of a vibrant workforce and also posed security risks.
He said that NITEL was so commercially viable that it contributed to NIPOST and provided support to the ECOMOG troops in Liberia and Sierra Leone.
He recalled that the BPE under the headship of El-Rufa’i rebuffed other options put on the table for revamping NITEL despite the fact that they had failed at six previous attempts at addressing the NITEL imbroglio.
Comrade Kazzah regretted El-Rufai’s handling of the controversial management contract insisting that the “coming of Pentascope was through the backdoor.”
He said that to demonstrate its reservation against the deal, NITEL workers blocked the gate of Transcorp Hilton venue of the signing of the management contract between BPE and Pentascope but that El-Rufai surreptitiously smuggled the parties to the deal through the back.
He noted that Pentascope came on board with preconceived agenda to have a run on the huge cash both local and foreign currency at the disposal of NITEL at that time and to disorganise and frustrate the network.
Meanwhile, a former Managing Director of NITEL, Professor Buba Bajoga who agreed to speak on record decried the destruction of NITEL as “very painful.”
He said by the time he left the organization as its head in 2000, NITEL was a very viable commercial organization.
“We approved the payment of dividends to government and I remember that I left N15 billion and U.S. Dollar 200 million in the coffers of the organization,” he said.
Professor Bajoga said NITEL made more profit than most banks. “We paid all our bills and were financing all our projects,” he added.
No tags for this post.