Court of Appeal sets aside tribunal judgment declaring Adeleke as duly elected governor of Osun




Court of Appeal sets aside Osun tribunal judgment which returned Sen. Ademola Adeleke, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP’s) candidate, as duly elected Governor.

Chairperson of the court, Justice Jumai-Hannatu Sankey, in the judgment declared Osun State Governor, Adegboyega Oyetola of the All Progressives Congress (APC) , as winner of the September 2018 election.

Oyetola approached the court, seeking it to set aside the majority judgment of the Osun State Election Petition Tribunal which nullified his election and declared Adeleke as winner of the September 2018 governorship election in Osun State.

NAN reports that the tribunal had in its Judgment on March 22, voided Oyetola’s election and ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to withdraw his Certificate of Return while at the same time ordered INEC to issue a fresh Certificate of Return to Adeleke.

However, Oyetola, who contested the last governorship election on the platform of the APC, faulted the majority judgment delivered by Justices Peter Obiora and Anyinla Gbolagunte.

The governor in his 39-ground Notice of Appeal filed on March 26, by his team of lawyers, led by Wole Olanipekun, SAN, claimed that the judgment was “perverse, replete with contradictions and not supported by evidence led by the petitioners”.

He therefore asked the appellate court to uphold his appeal, set aside the majority judgment and dismiss the Oct. 16, 2018 petition by PDP and Adeleke.

The governor said his complaint, in the appeal, was against the entire majority judgment, except where the tribunal held that it lacked jurisdiction to set aside INEC Guidelines; that the allegation of over voting was not proved; that the petitioners did not prove voided votes and other parts of the judgment where the tribunal agreed with their arguments.

Oyetola is contending, in his first ground of appeal, that the entire majority judgment was a nullity, because it was written and delivered by Justice Obiora “who did not participate in all the proceedings of the tribunal and who was not present when all the witnesses gave evidence.”

He noted that Justice Obiora was absent on Feb. 6, when the respondents witnesses Ayoola Soji and Oladejo Kazeem – testified and tendered exhibits, which the tribunal admitted in evidence.

The appellant argued that, having not attended the tribunal’s siting on Feb. 6, Justice Obiora could not have seen the two witnesses and was unable to examine their demeanour, as required, and therefore, unlawful for the judge to have authored a judgment in which he reviewed the evidence given by the witnesses.

He said: “The writing of and or the participation of the honourable justice P. C. Obiora in the writing of the judgment of the lower tribunal of March 22, and delivery of same, vitiates the entire judgment.”

Oyetola also argued that the tribunal, in its majority judgment, erred in law and acted without jurisdiction when it accepted the petitioners’ complained of non compliance with the provisions of Electoral Act in relation to the Sept. 22, 2018 governorship election in Osun State and on that basis proceeded to nullify the victory of Oyetola and APC.

It was equally the appellant’s contention that the tribunal acted without jurisdiction by basing its decision to uphold the petition and set aside the return of the appellants on the basis of allegation of non-compliance with the Electoral Act, in relation to the Sept. 22 governorship election.(NAN)




Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply