Viewpoint
|
Jos:
And the soldier wept |
|
By Reuben
Abati
The Guardian
Friday Jan 22,2010 |
A FRIEND captured part of the gravity of
the latest outbreak of violence in Jos,
Plateau State when he reported in a
discussion, that the elder brother of
another friend of his, an officer of the
Nigerian Army had broken down in tears
when he saw, first-hand, the extent of
the tragedy. The soldier leading other
ranks to quell the violence had said
that from the front of NASCO, all the
way to Rayfield, corpses littered the
streets in Jos. Wasted Nigerian lives!
Many of the victims were still alive but
they had been cut into pieces, they
could only writhe in pain, awaiting the
cessation of death throes and the
inevitable. The soldier not knowing what
to do started weeping. The conventional
wisdom is that soldiers are supposed to
be toughies not expected to break down
in tears at the war front. War is bound
to produce casualties. What happened on
Sunday January 17 in Jos, with
Christians and Moslems slaughtering each
other deserves no other name but WAR. A
senseless war. And yet on the
battle-field, the soldier who had been
brought in to make peace was so touched,
he wept. He must have seen that there
was neither rhyme nor reason to the
attendant death and destruction. But
increasingly, in Nigeria, too many
things do not make sense.
Tragedy in its most elemental form moves
us to tears even beyond the call of
duty. So, in Jos, a soldier wept. I am
immediately reminded of the tragedy in
Haiti, with Anderson Cooper of CNN
throwing aside his camcorder, rushing to
carry a bleeding young man in his hands
to ferry him to safety, away from a band
of shop looters who had bloodied his
head. In one instance, soldiering had to
wait. In the other, journalism. The
critical difference is that the
earthquake in Haiti is a natural
disaster. In Nigeria, the conflict is
entirely man-made, turning the entire
Nigerian nation itself into something of
a natural disaster. In Haiti, the
earthquake has produced thousands of
casualties. In Jos, it is the same - the
casualty figure according to one
newspaper is 446, all within two days!
The Independent newspaper UK puts the
figure around 500.
Given the Nigerian gift for
understatement, it could be worse. The
Haiti earthquake produced aftershocks
that have been just as devastating. The
Jos incident is equally an aftershock
arising from previous religious
earthquakes, brewed in the cauldron of
politics. Whereas the rest of the world
is rushing to the rescue of the people
of Haiti, the outside world is not
shocked by the crisis in Jos. There is
scarcity of food and water in Jos as
well as in Pankshin and Mangu to which
the violence has spread, about 5, 000
persons have been displaced, but neither
the UN nor the Red Cross is likely to
send relief materials. Sectarian
violence in Nigeria has assumed a
familiar and monotonous shape.
Human Rights Watch has advised that the
use of force should be restrained, but
every outside response is bound to be a
ringing indictment of Nigeria - a
country that has turned itself into a
disaster on the basis of religion,
ethnicity and poor politics. With an
absentee President and widespread
disregard for the rule of law, the
international community which has been
expressing anxiety about Nigeria would
take this as confirmation of its
established prejudices. Nor is it good
news that the Jos sectarian violence was
preceded by religious riots in Bauchi
and both by the December 25 Abdul
Mutallab terrorism incident involving a
US Detroit-bound aircraft.
The United States which had placed
Nigeria on a terror watch-list must feel
that its position has been vindicated.
What further proof does anyone need that
Nigeria breeds terror? What terror can
be worse than Christians and Muslims,
Biroms and Hausa-Fulanis turning guns
and machetes on each other on a Sunday
morning? There were reports that "fake
soldiers" wearing a pair of slippers
joined in the madness. Could this be why
the soldier of our narration wept?
Thisday newspaper has published the
photograph of the house which
purportedly caused the latest mayhem.
The Christian Association of Nigeria
denies that the crisis had anything to
do with the location of a house being
built by a Moslem in a supposedly
Christian neighbourhood, but that a
group of Moslems stormed a church - St.
Michael Catholic Church - during Sunday
worship and murdered a member of the
congregation. Each time there is
sectarian crisis in any part of Nigeria,
nobody ever knows what the actual cause
is. The real truth is usually lost in a
maze of partisan explanations. The
seriousness of the incident is however
easily measured in terms of lives lost,
and properties destroyed. It is terrible
that Nigerian cities are divided into
Christian and Moslem neighbourhoods.
Fifty years after independence, and
forty years after the official end of
the Nigerian civil war, Nigeria
nevertheless remains perpetually at war
with itself.
Sectarian violence has become recurrent
because of the failure of leadership.
Committees are set up to inquire into
the remote and immediate causes (a much
abused phrase) but in the end, nothing
happens. The latest outbreak of violence
occurred against the background of two
different panels of enquiry: the Prince
Bola Ajibola-led panel and the General
Emmanuel Abisoye-led panel which
investigated the November 28, 2008
outbreak of violence in Jos North. Is it
likely that those who wielded guns and
machetes last Sunday are not aware of
the moves to ensure reconciliation and
peace? The people do not care because
they know that government is not serious
and that the leaders in politics are
divided. What further evidence of
disagreement does anyone require other
than the differences that produced two
different panels of enquiry on Jos North
in 2008? The Federal Government had one
panel. The state government, another.
Same subject. Two panels. Outcome? Many
Nigerians do not trust their
governments. So at every opportunity,
they take the law into their hands.
The over 400 lives or more that have
been lost in Jos, this week are wasted
lives. Their murderers may never be
brought to book. The corpses will be
packed away, dumped in a mass grave, and
life will gradually return to normal.
The same streets that were lined with
corpses would come alive again, like
withered leaves sprouting anew. Where a
body once writhed in pain, slashed into
pieces, one Nigerian would erect his
suya stand and other Nigerians would
queue up, buy saut?ed meat and have fun.
No one will remember that where they
stand, innocent corpses - victims of a
culture of intolerance, once lay. We
have no respect for human lives.
Postponing every problem until it
degenerates into a crisis is a peculiar
trait in this country of impossible
paradoxes.
Peace will return to Jos only when both
the Federal and state governments and
the religious/traditional rulers in
Plateau state decided to address the
fundamental issues of citizenship and
ownership of the land. Peace may return
also when Nigeria generally becomes a
land of equal opportunities and human
rights are respected. But that cannot be
achieved when there are lasting doubts
about governance and the leaders are
more interested in pleasure rather than
work, rhetoric rather than concrete
action that can transform the country
and the people's lives.
The NYSC has threatened to withdraw
national youth corps members from
Plateau state should the crisis
continue. What is the Director-General
of the NYSC still waiting for? With
tragedy in Jos becoming a
self-fulfilling prophesy, very few
parents will be bold enough to allow
their children to go into a community
where the threat of ending life's
journey in a mass grave is real. The
lamentation of those who knew Jos in the
past when it used to be a peaceful city
and a melting pot of religious and
ethnic nationalities notwithstanding.
There is an Institute of Peace and
Conflict Resolution in Abuja. It is a
Federal Government parastatal. It is run
by a Director-General and a Board of
Directors. They travel abroad regularly,
collecting estacodes. Every month, they
receive salaries too.
There is also something fancifully
called the Council for Inter-Religious
Harmony (Understanding? Or Dialogue?).
But what has been the impact of peace
and conflict resolution in Nigeria? The
day is not long in coming when Nigerian
Christians would go to church with a
pistol and an Ak-47 carefully hidden in
their clothes and bags and Moslems would
carry daggers about like the men of
Yemen. When both begin to put their
weapons to use, the price for the
failure to address the politics of
sectarian violence in Nigeria would have
been paid.
|
|
|
|