Viewpoint
|
Nigerian
pilgrims and the attack on Saudi banks |
|
By Reuben Abati The Guardian Friday
Nov 6,2009 |
I AM not supporting
violent conduct but I think the Nigerian
pilgrims who took out their anger on a
number of Saudi banks on Tuesday,
November 3, smashing the banks' glass
windows and doors in the process deserve
understanding, not condemnation. The
story as reported in the Daily Trust
(Wed., Nov. 4) is explanatory enough.
One of the cardinal rules of banking is
that the service provider must know his
or her customer (KYC). This provides the
necessary guide in managing both
relationships and risks.
The Saudi bankers made the mistake of
subjecting pilgrims who needed to cash
their travellers cheques to unnecessary
delay and humiliation. First, it was
only Nigerian pilgrims that had to queue
up at the banks. Why Nigerians only?
Were the Saudi bankers trying to suggest
that the Nigerians could be holding
stolen cheques? Coming from a country
where a queue in a banking hall could
mean shoddy service, no money, or
humiliation, the Nigerian pilgrims must
have been seized by the emotional memory
of the banking situation at home,
forgetting for a while that they were in
the holy land. I have been in banking
halls where such delays led to the
customers raising their voices and
asking the tellers and their bosses to
hurry up. We are Nigerians. We don't
like to be delayed.
Has anyone forgotten the case of the
member of the House of Representatives
who was asked to show his identity card
by a security guard? He responded with a
slap to the guard's face. Don't you know
who I am? Don't the Saudis know that we
are Nigerians? The affected banks got
off lightly with only a few smashed
windows. It could have been worse. The
bank managers should count themselves
lucky they were not beaten up. The
Tuesday encounter must provide a
learning opportunity for the Saudi
Arabian banking sector: don't mess with
Nigerian customers, or any customer
coming from a country with a banking
crisis. I can bet that the key
impression in the minds of the Nigerian
pilgrims must have been about the
possibility of their cheques being dud
cheques.
Suppose the Saudi bankers were trying to
play a fast one on them. For three days,
the Nigerian pilgrims had tried to cash
their travellers cheques, but they were
reportedly kept on the queue from one
bank to the other and told stories. This
was in Saudi Arabia, not Nigeria.
Impossible, they must have thought. They
had no money; many of them could not buy
food. A few started spending the Naira
notes they had to buy food from fellow
Nigerians. Meanwhile, they were not sure
that their travellers cheques would be
honoured. Today, very few Nigerians
trust bankers. For the past month or so,
Nigerians, the pilgrims in Saudi Arabia
inclusive, had been treated to stories
and revelations about all kinds of sharp
practices by bankers. Bankers who steal
depositors funds. Bank CEOs who loot the
bank and use the funds to buy private
jets. Banks which give unmerited
overdrafts creating a new generation of
"onigbese billionaires".
Banking, even by the Central Bank of
Nigeria's recent definition has been
taken over by crooks who should face the
firing squad. It is not impossible that
some of the violent pilgrims may have
been swindled by Nigerian banks. Now to
get to Saudi Arabia and be told their
travellers cheques (which should be as
good as cash at hand) would have to
wait, was more than enough provocation.
If the Saudis have a video tape of the
protest by the pilgrims, they should
study it carefully: many of the pilgrims
must have been saying: "Na lie o, una no
fit thief our money for this place? If
anybody try dat thing wey dem try for
Nigeria here, dat person go hear word.
Are you saying our cheques are bad
because we are Nigerians?" The smashing
of the windows was just a warning
signal: the Nigerians could have smashed
vehicles or start a bonfire on the main
road, or carry placards. If the matter
was not resolved quickly, they could
have sent an SOS to the President of the
Nigeria Labour Congress "to come quickly
to Medina and save us with protest
rallies!" They need to be understood: no
Nigerian pilgrim behaved in that manner
last year or at any other time before
now. But these days, banking
transactions drive Nigerians up the wall
and raise their worst fears.
Good news: none of the pilgrims was
arrested. You see, the Saudis knew they
were at fault and they didn't want the
Nigerian Foreign Affairs Minister coming
over to give them a lecture in
international diplomacy! Last Sunday,
officials of the Saudi Central Bank went
to the Nigeria Hajj Mission in Medina to
lodge a formal protest about the
attitude of some Nigerian pilgrims and
"to appeal to Nigerian officials to
prevail on the pilgrims on the need to
be patient in whatever they do while in
the holy land." If the Nigerian
officials had done their job in the
first place, assisting the pilgrims with
logistics and information, there would
have been no problem. Many of the
pilgrims involved were old women and
illiterates who could not understand why
they had to queue up in a Saudi bank.
The Nigerian hajj mission says "it is
doing its best to protect Nigeria's good
image in Saudi Arabia." I don't think
so.
The Saudi Central Bank officials more or
less expressed surprise that anyone in
the Holy land could behave as the
Nigerians did. All that talk about the
Holy Land begs the issue. The pilgrims
who broke the windows do not need to be
told that they are in the holy land.
They know. And that sermon about
patience? In fact, if a quiz were to be
conducted on what the Holy Quoran says
about patience and forbearance, the
Nigerians could win the prize. The only
problem is that in Nigeria, religion is
an event for many persons, not a way of
life even when they pretend that it is.
There is a yawning gap between private
and public morality that explains
individual and group attitudes. It is a
contradiction that outsiders may find
puzzling but which means nothing to us
at home. Some of the most embarrassing
infractions in public life have been
committed by persons who occupy the
front row in churches and mosques. One
pastor who died in a plane crash a few
years ago left behind an estate worth
billions of Naira; the EFCC traced the
money to accounting fraud he committed,
when his two widows began to fight over
the sharing of assets.
Persons who have been indicted in the
current banking crisis are also very
prominent patrons of religious groups.
So, the Saudi authorities do not need to
preach to Nigerian pilgrims. They know
already that Islam is a religion of
peace. They know that it teaches
patience, temperance, and forbearance.
But "not where money is involved"- that
is the simple message from the Nigerian
camp. Going to Nigerian officials may
not help: Nigerians do not trust their
officials, who if they are allowed to
get involved could start asking every
pilgrim for a percentage kickback! What
the Saudi Central Bank authorities
should do is to ensure the prompt
payment of the travellers cheques as was
the practice in the past.
Saudi banks do not work every day. What
is that? They should work everyday
whenever Nigerian pilgrims are in town!
They should do everything to avoid
provoking Nigerians in the future. Only
a few windows and doors were broken this
year; the pilgrims could arrive in
Medina next year better prepared to
break heads should any bank waste time
attending to them. The Saudis should
learn from the British. When they built
a brand new Terminal 5 at Heathrow
Airport, a special section for the
re-packing of excess luggage was
reserved for Nigerians, the biggest
load-carriers in the world! We are a
nation of reasonable people. We just
expect other people to be fair to us.
More importantly, Nigerians know their
rights. Since the country's return to
democratic rule in 1999, every Nigerian
has been talking about rights. Insisting
on those rights, as patiently as
possible, as the law requires and the
religions preach, may not necessarily
attract the attention of government or
bring results. In effect, most Nigerians
have learnt to take their rights into
their hands and act as their own
enforcers. When university lecturers
patiently told government to honour
agreements reached on conditions of
service as far back as 2002 and the
officials kept dragging their feet, the
teachers went on strike, shutting down
the entire university system for four
months.
Eventually, they got the government to
listen to them, even getting more than
they had asked for. In the Niger Delta
also, patience didn't help. The people
had been waiting since 1957 for projects
and programmes that successive
governments said were in the pipeline.
Militant youths seized those pipelines,
broke them down and held the entire
country to ransom. Now, they have been
able to get some attention. It is the
same Nigerian strategy that has been
applied with the Saudi Arabian banks in
the matter of unpaid travellers cheques.
A few broken windows and doors and the
Saudi Central Bank had to wake up:
Nigerians are in town, and they are
pilgrims with a difference!
|
|
|
|