|
NOBEL laureate, Prof. Wole Soyinka,
yesterday again reviewed President Umaru
Musa Yar'Adua's approach to the Niger
Delta crisis, and concluded that the
President is set to make a "fundamental
mistake."
He noted that the core issues behind the
struggle of the Movement for the
Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND)
were similar to the agitations of
majority of Nigerians for several years.
Soyinka identified the issues as the
restructuring of Nigeria on more
equitable lines, fiscal federalism,
revenue allocation, derivation, among
others. Indeed, playing on a word and
the acronym MEND, Soyinka said what
Nigeria needs is to 'mend' itself as
opposed to the attempt to 'rebrand' by
the Yar'Adua government.
"We are talking about the distortion
that has taken place since this nation
obtained 'independence'", he said, and
in this regard, "the crisis of the Niger
Delta region can only be solved
holistically."
At a press conference in Lagos
yesterday, Soyinka said that he was not
defending MEND or sympathetic to it, but
admitted that, "MEND is simply
Pro-National Conference Organisations (PRONACO)
by other means. "What PRONACO was about,
was precisely to avoid the resort to
this other means. The aims of PRONACO
and MEND in fact, tally at various
points. It is the methodology that is
different. That is why I used the
expression, 'MEND is simply PRONACO by
other means.'"
He said the Yar'Adua administration was
still making a fundamental mistake and
about to lose another opportunity of
resolving the crisis in the troubled
region. He asked rhetorically: "What do
I mean? You hand over amnesty, you offer
rehabilitation money, you offer the
proposed structures for the mobilisation
etc. etc. and the problem of the Niger
Delta can't be solved outside a holistic
concept of what Nigeria should be."
The literary icon observed that violence
should be accepted as a consequence of
the agitation of MEND. He said that
nobody should expect an organisation
like MEND to be composed of angels after
all, but noted that MEND also has a
responsibility to assist the general
community in flushing out racketeers.
This is the responsibility of any
liberal organisation.
While he called for condolences to the
relations of the victims of the MEND
attack on Atlas Cove, he stressed that
"we must deplore the necessity of any
kind of action that leads to losses of
Nigerians' lives as a result of
insecurity. This and other factors are
lamentable. They are not normal. We are
not living under normal circumstances."
He deplored the insinuations that the
attack had any kind of ethnic coloration
to it notwithstanding the fact that the
attack took place on Lagos soil. "It was
not an attack on Yoruba people."
He said: "As a Yoruba man, I want to
state quite clearly that I don't think
that I have been assaulted because of
the reality of ethnic grouping. The kind
of language that is used to classify it
as ethnic attack is fraught with
dangers, not only for the Yoruba people,
not just for Lagos, but also for the
entire nation and I think that elders,
especially those who called themselves
elders and therefore leaders of thought
and leaders of reactions and responses,
have to be far more guarded in their
language. The facility that was blown
up, I am not aware that it was labelled
Yoruba oil depot. I haven't seen any
Benin Oil Depot, I haven't seen any
Hausa Oil Depot. I haven't even seen any
Ijaw Oil Depot. So, where does ethnicity
come into the picture?"
Soyinka made light of the ultimatum and
call for an apology by Yoruba elders.
Calling for a distinction between
pragmatism, realism and emotionalism, he
said that the demand for apology is just
"an emotional reaction." On the call for
an ultimatum, he asked: "To whom are you
issuing it exactly? Do you know MEND?
Who are the forces of MEND? Who do you
direct the ultimatum to? I don't like
the language of ultimatum especially
when that ultimatum is being issued on
behalf of the entity which I am a part
of: Yoruba nation issuing an ultimatum?"
He worried that "violence has been
institutionalised in this nation
anyway." And in an open reference to the
immediate past Olusegun Obasanjo
presidency, Soniynka added: "Thuggery
has been institutionalised and at no
time more frequently so than under the
last president of this nation. We had an
entire state handed over to thugs. We
had the President of the nation as
political father to a notorious son and
virtually handing over the whole state
to him. We had the state of Anambra
handed over with the connivance of the
Federal Government to thugs for mayhem.
"So, let us not over-dramatise violence,
at least not in this particular country.
What I'm saying is this: don't let's get
too sanctimonious. Don't let's start
pretending that we are not aware that
human being is such that, the purity
attached very often is to the loftiest
ideals. Therefore, nobody in this
country should expect an organisation
like MEND to be composed entirely of
angels. But MEND also has a
responsibility to assist the general
community in flushing its racketeers.
This is the responsibility of any
liberal organisation.
"Let's not sentimentalise violence. We
know what violence is. We know the
violence that is being committed against
Nigerian people even as I speak -
violence that comes from the denial of
facilities, denial of shelter, violence
that comes from denial of the basic
infrastructure that enables people to
reproduce themselves. These are all
forms of violence."
Soyinka wryly finds a rhythmic link
between the ongoing rebranding of the
country and MEND. He describes it as a
coincidence, that "we have a lot of
rebranding and we have MEND, which is an
acronym which poses itself as a kind of
conceptual option to rebranding." And
then asked: "Is what Nigeria needs
rebranding or mending that it requires?
When I hear rebrand, rebrand, my mind
actually goes to mend, mend, mend."
He continued: "If you have a rickety
vehicle for instance, if you are
rebranding with a coat of paints on it,
even repair some of the woods in the
Bolekaja, put slogans, 'united we stand,
divided we fall,' 'it's a long way to
heaven,' some of those things we used to
see. We don't see them often now. I
regret them because I used to call them
mobile mirrors. You cannot rebrand those
things because the engine of the vehicle
is still going to knock. The bodywork is
going to fall into pieces. The paint
will peel sooner or later. You have got
to mend that vehicle in a very
structured way. You have got to get to
the inner workings and completely retool
the components of that vehicle before
you can start rebranding. Otherwise, all
the expressions, trying to put a
lipstick on a pig's mouth... it is still
a pig.
"What we need to do is to mend this
vehicle and mend it in a more
fundamental way. And that is the
question that has been posed by MEND.
That is why it has been foolish all
along to dismiss the militants in the
Delta as a bunch of rascals as the
governments had tried to do for so many
years. That's what has brought us to our
present situation."
The playwright also wondered if
Nigerians would ever know the nature of
forgiveness. "Did they truly forgive
Nigeria when we are yet to account for
the amount of money which the World Bank
and other international bodies assisted
us in recovering from many people who
looted this nation? Has anything be on
accounted for so far?" he asked.
|